US to call for ‘immediate and sustained’ Gaza ceasefire at UN Security Council

US

A resolution calling for an “immediate and sustained ceasefire” in Gaza will be voted on by the UN Security Council today.

The draft has been sponsored by the US, Israel’s closest ally, which has vetoed three resolutions calling for a ceasefire in recent months.

A cessation of hostilities is described as “imperative” for protecting civilians and enabling humanitarian aid to reach more than two million Palestinians.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Former hostage of Hamas speaks to Sky News

US ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield has expressed optimism that the 15-member council will approve the resolution.

While Moscow has said it will not be satisfied “with anything that doesn’t call for an immediate ceasefire”.

Its deputy UN ambassador has questioned the draft’s wording.

“What’s an imperative? I have an imperative to give you $100, but… it’s only an imperative, not $100.”

Analysis: Will the US resolution pass?

Is today the moment the world’s top diplomatic body comes together in a collective call for a ceasefire in Gaza? Or will messy, discombobulating and cynical geopolitics get in the way? Will Russia vote for an American resolution?

At 9am New York time (1pm UK time) the United Nations Security Council will vote on a resolution calling for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas.

Déjà vu? Yes. We’ve been here several times before. Resolutions over the past few months have used different constructions of the same sentences by different countries to find a form of word upon which all sides can agree.

Every time, the United States has been the blocker, vetoing calls for ceasefires because it argued they would only benefit Hamas.

This resolution is different. It was penned by America using its strongest language to date.

Read Mark’s full analysis here.

In other developments, Israel’s spy chief is heading to Qatar as negotiations on a potential ceasefire continue there.

The US is helping to mediate the talks, with Secretary of State Antony Blinken expressing hope a deal could be reached.

“Negotiators continue to work. The gaps are narrowing, and we’re continuing to push for an agreement in Doha. There’s still difficult work to get there. But I continue to believe it’s possible,” he said.

Read more world news:
Head of UN agency blocked from Gaza
Analysis: Will Biden criticism ring hollow?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Israel needs to do more’

A six-week truce is being discussed that would allow the release of 40 Israeli hostages in return for hundreds of Palestinians detained in Israeli jails.

This would pave the way for more aid to enter Gaza – with experts recently warning that “famine is imminent”.

On Thursday, UK Foreign Secretary Lord Cameron spoke of his “enormous frustration” that British aid for Gaza had been stuck at the border for almost three weeks.

Palestinian children wait to receive aid in Rafah. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Palestinian children wait to receive aid in Rafah. Pic: Reuters

Mr Blinken will meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his war cabinet today – as his sixth urgent mission to the Middle East since the conflict began.

There are growing disagreements between Mr Netanyahu and President Joe Biden over Tel Aviv’s determination to launch a ground assault in Rafah, where more than one million Palestinians have sought refuge.

Speaking in Cairo on Thursday, Mr Blinken had warned: “A major military operation in Rafah would be a mistake, something we don’t support. And, it’s also not necessary to deal with Hamas, which is necessary.”

Mr Netanyahu has told US politicians he plans to proceed with the operation nonetheless.

Articles You May Like

Messi and Inter Miami were flying high and favorites to win MLS Cup. What happened?
Yale University introduces Beyonce-themed course
Fire in neonatal ward kills 10 newborn babies
Microplastics Could Be Changing Earth’s Climate, Reveals New Study
China’s premier air show wows spectators – but the West won’t have liked seeing Russia’s jets